CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DETERMINING THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE CALCULATED USING CYSTATIN C IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS IN THE UZBEK POPULATION

Received: 2026-03-26

Published: 2026-06-29

Abstract

Objective. To comparatively evaluate the diagnostic performance of different methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), depending on the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD).


Materials and Methods. This single-center cross-sectional study included 45 patients with T1DM (23 males and 22 females; median age, 15.5 years). Descriptive, correlation (Spearman), and regression analyses were performed.


Results. A marked discrepancy was found in CKD stage distribution depending on the method used to calculate GFR. Based on creatinine, 88.4% of patients were classified as stage C1, whereas according to the CKiD 2012 formula, only 29.5% were classified as C1, 65.9% as C2, and 4.5% as C3a. HbA1c (β=2.719; p=0.008) and TIR (β=0.222; p=0.015) were independent risk factors for GFR estimated by CKiD 2012 (R²=0.394).


Conclusion. The study results showed that the CKiD 2012 formula demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for cystatin C-based estimation of GFR.

List of references

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. Brussels: IDF; 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org

  2. Ogle GD, James S, Dabelea D, et al. Global estimates of incidence of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Atlas, 10th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109083

  3. Алимова Н.У., Рахимова Г.Н. Эпидемиология и лечение детей и подростков с сахарным диабетом 1 типа в Узбекистане в ходе проведения регистра. Монография.

  4. Alimova NU, Rakhimova GN. Epidemiological data of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children in Uzbekistan, 1998–2014. Pediatric Diabetes. 2018;19(S27):158-165.

  5. Рахимова Г.Н., Алимова Н.У., Халматова К.И. Эпидемиологические показатели СД 1 типа среди детей и подростков в Республике Узбекистан. ZDIT. 2025;4(35):50-51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 17481319

  6. Rossing P, Groop PH, Singh R, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Among Adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(8):1395-1399. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0335

  7. Boettcher C, Utsch B, Galler A, et al. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates Calculated by New and Old Equations in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00052

  8. Benoit SW, Ciccia EA, Devarajan P. Cystatin C as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease: Latest developments. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020;20(10):1019-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2020.1796624

  9. Dahl H, Meyer K, Sandnes K, et al. Cystatin C proteoforms in chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(1):e0269436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269436

  10. Battelino T, Alexander CM, Amiel SA, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(1):42-57. https://doi.org/10.1 016/S2213-8587(22)00319-9

  11. Guo Q, Zang P, Xu S, et al. Time in Range Is Reversely Associated with Diabetic Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:5817074. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5817074

  12. Schwartz GJ, Work DF. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(11):1832-1843. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01640309 [formula reference]

  13. Filler G, Lepage N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(10):981-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1271-5 [formula reference]

  14. Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2012;82(4):445-453. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.169 [CKiD 2012 formula]

  15. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.

  16. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S):S117-S314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018

  17. He D, Gao B, Wang J, et al. Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based eGFR and Risk of Diabetic Microvascular Complications. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(5):873-880. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-1818

  18. Bjornstad P, Dart A, Donaghue KC, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1432-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13444

  19. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, et al. New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(19):1737-1749. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953

  20. KDIGO Diabetes Work Group. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022;102(5S):S1-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008

About the Authors

Gulnara N. Rakhimova
Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers
Nasiba U. Alimova
Republikcan Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Endocrinology Named After Academician Y.H. Turakulov
Kamola I. Khalmatova
Republikcan Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Endocrinology Named After Academician Y.H. Turakulov

License

How to Cite

1.
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DETERMINING THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE CALCULATED USING CYSTATIN C IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS IN THE UZBEK POPULATION. MSU [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Oct. 13];5(3):53-61. Available from: https://fdoctors.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/288

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.


ISSN 2181-3612 (Online)