Maktab yoshidagi bolalarda oqsil-energetik yetishmovchilikda tana tarkibining ko‘p komponentli bioimpedans tahlili natijalari

Qabul qilingan: 2026-02-24

Nashr etilgan: 2026-04-30

Annotatsiya

Maqsad. OEY bo‘lgan bolalarda ko‘p komponentli bioimpedans tahlili (MEDASS BIA) parametrlari
— Faza burchagi, Aktiv kletka massasi (AKM), Yog‘ massasi (YM), Skelet-mushak massasi (SMM) hamda Asosiy almashinuv (AA) ko‘rsatkichlarining diagnostik axborotdorligini an’anaviy antropomet­riya (TVI) bilan qiyosiy baholash.
Materiallar va usullar. Klinik tadqiqotda 6–13 yoshli 10 nafar OEY bo‘lgan bola va 10 nafar sog‘lom tengdoshi (nazorat guruhi) qamrab olindi. Bemorlar yoshiga (6–9 yosh: 70,0%, 10–13 yosh: 30,0%), jinsiga (60,0% o‘g‘il, 40,0% qiz), etiologik omillariga (alimentar 60,0%, ikkinchi darajali 40,0%) va OEY og‘irlik darajasiga (I darajali subklinik: 40,0%, II darajali o‘rta: 40,0%, III darajali og‘ir kaxektik: 20,0%) ko‘ra differensiallanib, antropometriya va MEDASS bioimpedans tahlili (PA, AKM, SMM, YM, AA) o‘tkazildi.
Natijalar. OEY guruhida TVI 13,51 ± 0,32 kg/m2 (nazoratda 16,33 ± 0,86 kg/m2, p < 0, 001)
bo‘lgani holda, bioimpedans parametrlarida chuqur tizimli o‘zgarishlar aniqlandi: Faza burchagi 5,17
± 0,17◦ ga (nazoratda 5,59 ± 0,28◦, p < 0, 05), SMM 7,96 ± 1,30 kg ga (p < 0, 05) va AKM 9,42
± 0,75 kg ga (normadan 66–75% gacha, p < 0, 01) pasaydi. Yog‘ massasi ulushi keskin defitsitni (%YM = 7,78 ± 0,89% vs 16,76 ± 0,30%, p < 0, 001), AA esa 916,0 ± 23,5 kkal/sutkaga tushib, metabolik adaptatsiyani ko‘rsatdi (p < 0, 01).
Xulosa. Ko‘p komponentli BIA usuli OEYning subklinik bosqichida hujayra va metabolik o‘zgarishlar-ni aniqlashda antropometriyaga nisbatan yuqori diagnostik sezgirlikka ega.

Adabiyotlar ro'yxati

  1. Lukaski H. C., Kyle U. G., et al. Evolution of bioimpedance analysis in clinical pediatric nutrition // European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. – 2023. – Vol. 77. – No. 3. – P. 315-325.

  2. Norman K., Stobäus N., et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a screening tool for cellular malnutrition and functional impairment in children // Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. –2021. – Vol. 24. – No. 5. – P. 410-416.

  3. Bosy-Westphal A., Jensen B., et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle: population reference values and determinants in children and adolescents // The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. – 2020. – Vol. 112. – No. 4. – P. 1085-1094.

  4. Earthman C. P. Body composition assessment tools for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and cachexia in pediatric practice // JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. – 2022. – Vol. 46. – No. 2. – P. 431-442.

  5. Wells J. C. K. et al. Pediatric body composition and skeletal muscle mass depletion under acute and chronic nutrient restriction // Pediatric Research. – 2021. – Vol. 89. – No. 6. – P. 1367-1375.

  6. Campanozzi A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis in hospitalised children with subclinical protein-energy malnutrition // Clinical Nutrition. – 2022. – Vol. 41. – No. 8. – P. 1720-1728.

  7. Barrea L. et al. Phase angle as a cellular marker of membrane integrity, hydration status, and protein dynamics in pediatric populations // Frontiers in Nutrition. – 2024. – Vol. 11. – Art. 104521.

  8. Zingales V. et al. Skeletal muscle mass index derived from multi-frequency BIA in assessing child undernutrition and muscle wasting // Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. – 2023. – Vol. 76. – No. 4. – P. 512-520.

  9. Marra M. et al. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) and phase angle in pediatric clinical practice: a systematic review // Nutrients. – 2021. – Vol. 13. – No. 5. – Art. 1472.

  10. Gizzonio V. et al. Cellular membrane integrity and bioimpedance phase angle shifts in chronic pediatric wasting conditions // Pediatric Diabetes & Nutrition. – 2022. – Vol. 23. – No. 3. – P. 289-297.

  11. Müller M. J. et al. Functional body composition and metabolic cell mass regulation in pediatric malnutrition // European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. – 2020. – Vol. 74. – No. 2. – P. 177-186.

  12. Slinde F. et al. Reference values for bioelectrical impedance phase angle in European pediatric populations // Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition. – 2023. – Vol. 67. – No. 1. – P. 45-53.

  13. Pichard C. et al. Non-invasive BIA monitoring of protein reserve recovery during pediatric nutritional rehabilitation // Nutrition in Clinical Practice. – 2021. – Vol. 36. – No. 4. – P. 812-821.

  14. Benton M. J. et al. Impedance phase angle correlates with muscle strength and visceral protein stores in malnourished children // Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. – 2022. – Vol. 46. – No. 7. – P. 1610-1618.

  15. Bellini G. et al. Multi-frequency BIA phase angle in early subclinical protein-energy malnutrition detection: a multi-center trial // Acta Paediatrica. – 2025. – Vol. 114. – No. 2. – P. 210-218.

  16. Ahmedov M. A., Rahimov B. SH. Maktab yoshidagi bolalarda nutritiv maqom buzilishlarini zamonaviy biofizik va antropometrik tashxislash usullari // O‘zbekiston Tibbiyot Jurnali. – 2023. – № 4. – B. 38-44.

  17. Karimov SH. I., Yo‘ldoshev A. A. Bolalar gipotrofiyasida hujayra membranasi bioimpedans ko‘rsatkichlarining patofizilogik dinamikasi // Pediatriya Jurnali. – 2024. – № 2. – B. 15-21.

  18. Mamatqulov B. M., Qodirova N. A. Maktab o‘quvchilarining jismoniy rivojlanishi va oqsil-energetik yetishmovchiligining epidemiologik xususiyatlari // Tibbiyotda Yangi Kun. – 2022. – № 5 (43). – B. 112-118.

  19. Sulaymonov A. S., Rizaev J. A. Pediatriya amaliyotida tana tarkibini bioimpedansmetriya yordamida baholashning diagnostik samaradorligi // Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. – 2021. – Vol. 2. – No. 3. – P. 78-85.

  20. Tursunov X. Z., Mirzahmedova K. T. Surunkali oqsil-yetishmovchiligi bo‘lgan bolalarda skelet-mushak massasi va metabolik faol hujayra massasi o‘zgarishlari // Doktor Axborotnomasi. – 2023. – № 1 (108). – B. 54-60.

  21. Ismoilov O. I., Abdullayeva M. K. Bolalar oziqlanishi disbalansida bioimpedansmetriyaning faza burchagi ko‘rsatkichining prognostik ahamiyati // O‘zbekiston Vrachlar Assotsiatsiyasi Bulteni. – 2020. – № 3. –

  22. B. 29-34.

  23. Rasulov SH. M., Nazarov B. B. Maktab yoshidagi bolalarda subklinik gipotrofiya bosqichida tana vazni indeksi va BIA ko‘rsatkichlarining korrelyatsion tahlili // Toshkent Tibbiyot Akademiyasi Axborotnomasi. – 2024. – № 3. – B. 45-51.

  24. Sultanov X. A., Qosimova SH. N. Nutritiv qo‘llab-quvvatlash jarayonida bolalar skelet-mushak massasi va bioimpedans faza burchagi monitoringi // Pediatriya va Bolalar Xirurgiyasi Jurnali. – 2025. – № 1. – B. 62-68.

  25. Niyazov B. S., Yuldasheva D. A. Maktab yoshidagi bolalarda gipotrofiya va oqsil disbalansini erta aniqlashda bioimpedans tahlilining o‘rni // O‘zbekiston Tashxis va Davolash Jurnali. – 2023. – № 2. – B. 51-57.

  26. Xalmatova B. T., Rahmatullayev A. A. Bolalar nutritiv maqomini baholashda tana tarkibi komponentlarining patogenetik va diagnostik ahamiyati // Pediatriya va Bolalar Oziqlanishi Jurnali. – 2025. – № 2. – B. 33-40.

Mualliflar haqida

Sanoat Sh.Ravshanova
Respublika ixtisoslashtirilgan pediatriya ilmiy-amaliy tibbiyot markazi

Litsenziya

Qanday iqtibos keltirish kerak

1.
Maktab yoshidagi bolalarda oqsil-energetik yetishmovchilikda tana tarkibining ko‘p komponentli bioimpedans tahlili natijalari. MSU [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 7];5(2):50-6. Available from: https://fdoctors.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/275

O'xshash maqolalar

Siz ham ushbu maqola uchun {$ advancedSearchLink} olishingiz mumkin.


ISSN 2181-3612 (Online)